26 views 6 mins 0 comments

‘Robbed’: Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach Controversy — ‘Tank’ Knee No-Call Sets Off Boxing World

In Sin categoría
March 03, 2025
Gervonta Davis and Lamont Roach: The Fight That Divided Fans

The recent bout between Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis and Lamont Roach Jr. at the Barclays Center in New York has stirred up a significant amount of controversy. What many expected to be an explosive matchup for the WBA lightweight title turned into a heated debate surrounding officiating and fight integrity. Following an intense twelve rounds, the fight ended in a majority draw, leaving fans and analysts in disbelief.

The Controversial Moment

In the pivotal Round 9, Davis, the heavily favored fighter, took a knee after receiving a jab from Roach. This action, which seemed to catch both the audience and the referee Steve Willis by surprise, was intended by Davis to signal for his corner to wipe grease from his braids that had obscured his vision. However, under boxing regulations, a fighter cannot call their own timeout. Consequently, many believe this moment should have been ruled an official knockdown against Davis.

Scoring the Unscorable

As the fight hit its climax, the judges scored it with two 114-114s and one 115-113 for Davis. Had the knee been scored as a knockdown, the landscape of the bout—and possibly Davis’ undefeated record—would have drastically changed. Roach, who had been fighting valiantly, would have gained a significant advantage in the round, which in point-scoring terms could have led to a split decision victory.

The Weight of Expectations

Bookmakers had pegged Davis as an overwhelming 18-to-1 favorite, causing many to question how the bout unfolded. Davis, known for his knockout power, was supposed to dominate. Yet, Roach’s performance was nothing short of inspiring. He managed to stand toe-to-toe with one of the pound-for-pound best, only to be denied what could have been a life-changing victory.

Voices of Dissent

The outrage following the fight was palpable. High-profile boxers and analysts took to social media to express their frustration:

  • Terence Crawford, a fellow champion, tweeted, “Roach won and that should have been called a knockdown. Let’s see what happens.”
  • Shawn Porter reflected, “Round 9 should be a 10-8 round for Roach,” emphasizing the significant impact of the missed call.
  • Claressa Shields added, “How much they paying the ref? This is crazy,” highlighting the gravity of the mistake.

The consensus was clear: Roach had been robbed of his moment.

A Fight Impacting Careers and Legacies

The implications of the referee’s decision extend beyond this singular fight. For Roach, the failure to recognize the knockdown not only meant the loss of a significant victory but also potential financial repercussions in the millions of dollars due to the loss of sponsorships and title shots that often accompany championship wins.

Reflections on Refereeing in Boxing

This incident has reignited long-standing discussions on the quality of officiating in boxing. Boxing is a sport that thrives on split-second decisions that can alter the course of a fighter’s career. The New York State Athletic Commission (NYSAC) faced harsh criticism, with many voices calling for accountability and improvement in officiating standards.

Calls for Action

As the boxing community rallies for justice for Roach, the question remains: what actions can be taken to prevent a recurrence of such controversies? Several fighters, including Keith Idec and Dan Rafael, have voiced support for an immediate rematch, emphasizing that Roach earned it through his hard-fought performance. The overwhelming call for reviewing officiating protocols could lead to changes aimed at preventing similar oversights in the future.

The Ripple Effect of Fight Outcomes

Beyond the personal impact on Roach, such controversies reflect a broader issue within the sport — how decisions made in the ring affect lives outside of it. Boxing matches can determine a fighter’s career trajectory, build or break reputations, and influence financial stability. It is crucial for governing bodies to ensure that integrity and fairness are upheld.

The Final Word

In the end, the Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach bout serves as a reminder of the stakes in professional boxing and the potential fallout from officiating errors. Intellectual discussions on the effectiveness of officiating and the rules of the sport must continue to keep the essence of ‘fair play’ alive. The boxing world watches and waits — will there be a rematch? More importantly, how will the sport address these significant challenges moving forward?

For more information and updates on the Davis vs. Roach outcome, check out the extensive coverage by Yahoo Sports here.


To learn about the disclaimer of liability for the content of this website, click here